Tuesday, February 17, 2009

On Spirituality

A friend from NPR writes:

"What do we, as human beings, generally mean by spirituality?

"I'm interested in it because it can have importance and significance to the deeply religious and the distinctly secular. I tried to construct a religion continuum and had come to the conclusion there was an inversely proportional element to it; so that the more "intellectual" an individual, the less "spiritual" and vice-versa. Taking it to a logical extension - An atheist might be considered highly intellectual and lacking in spirituality while an occultist might be highly spiritual and lacking in intellectuality. But I don't doubt you could have reverse exceptions to this idea.

"I placed the monotheisms (Judaism, Christianity and Islam) in the middle of the spectrum. The implication being there is a balance between intellectual and spiritual.

"But I ask again: What are we talking about when we refer to the spiritual?"

Sir A.N. attempts to take on this thorny, age-old question.

Let's start with a deliberately intellectual approach to the question. If we analyze (could any process be more brain-based?) the word, we find the that at its root, spirituality is related to the Latin spirare, "to breathe." The word "inspire" means, then, literally "to breathe in." Returning to the question of my friend, how does breathing in relate to the literal meaning of religion: "to bind together again"? I will set this aside for now to turn to my own narrative.

Part I


I was raised in a non- but not anti-religious house. We weren't against church; it just never came up. In the Washington of the 70s, the only overtly religious people I knew were Jews and Catholics. Legend has it that I announced to my mother at the age of five that "there is no God," but I don't remember this. I do remember as a teenager that as I gained a radical political consciousness, so did I acquire a disdain, even a hatred of organized religion. This was the Reagan era, and backlash was everywhere. The religious right had been born in the TV studios, and Jerry Falwell was in the news regularly.

Yes, the above equation did hold true for me: I considered all religion to be occultist, and educated, rational people had no use for it. I cobbled together a set of beliefs that was part 60s radical, humanist activism; part carefree Bohemian; and part DIY 80s punk. Certain truisms held sway with me as strongly as the Ten Commandments rule the religious: corporations are bad, the government lies, the rich and powerful control the world for their profit, Art is good, commerce is bad.

Where did spirituality fit into the mix? Living in San Francisco, I couldn't help but be exposed to certain counter-cultural elements that borrowed from various religious traditions: Hare Krishna temples that offered sacred vegetarian feasts, yoga studios, Tai Chi practitioners, meditation, prayer circles. Of course, the exotic and especially Eastern were favored over the prosaic and domestic. I didn't know too many Baptists or see their rituals practiced. Other aspects of the belief system I came to internalize harbored spiritual elements, especially environmentalism. Here, the Earth itself was worshipped, evidenced by the referrals to "Mother Earth" or "Gaia," often as a conspicuous antidote to what was seen as the male dominance of conventional religion.

Similarly, certain activities in which I partook with others were often shrouded in mystical, spiritual-like reverence. Epic bike rides up Mt. Tamalpais. Midnight bonfires at Ocean Beach. Days spent in Golden Gate Park. Above all, for me, creating, rehearsing, and performing live music was the closest thing in my life that combined the breathing in implied by "inspiration" and the binding together with others of a similar faith suggested by the word "religion." Indeed, the word "music" itself comes directly from the word "muse."

All through this period of my life I unhesitatingly called myself an atheist. Anything less would have seemed absurd. I could make no sense of God in my life, and in my youthful bravura, I did not entertain doubt easily. I was proud, certain, even arrogant that I was right and that all those church-going sheep were deluded, brainwashed, unimaginative fools.

Upon moving to North Carolina, I was stunned to find that many people's first question upon meeting me would be "where do you go to church?" Not do you go, but where... What was going on? I would meet someone whom I would read as non-religious: an alternative, slacker-looking type with tattoos, piercings, weird hair. Soon into a conversation, the inevitable "at my church" comment would come up, leaving me baffled. I thought churchies were buttoned-up squares, lily-white Bible-thumping racists or (perversely more acceptable) gospel-singing black people. Hmm, I wondered, who has the stereotypes now? And, simultaneously, where on Earth have I landed? Where are the sane secularists? Since then I have come to see that there are plenty of agnostics, atheists, and alternative religious types in the South, but also how important church is to most folks' sense of family, stability, and community. I wasn't sure about the inspiration part, but the binding together of a community was evident in ways that could certainly make an outsider jealous. Except for the little problem of belief. Of course, one of the first people I met in Winston-Salem was a Wake Forest professor, a regal sounding gentleman with a refined local accent, who calmly told an assembled group of graduate students that he was an atheist, but he faithfully attended church because he "enjoyed the ritual."

As I have grown, the less certain I am of anything I believed as a younger man. Is there a God? I have no idea. Does it matter? Possibly. I feel too personally insignificant in the scope of the universe to think that it--or I--matters much. The pull of the continuum described by my friend's question repels me from hard-line atheism as much from organized religion. I feel the hush of something greater than me when I hike, cook, look at my wife and children, see the "a-ha!" face of one of my students.

Part II later: but in the meantime, it would be interesting to hear from others on this topic, either here or via email.

23 comments:

  1. I don't think there would be much of any religion without ritual. I always considered the two inseparable. Anyway, I am largely where you are now at this point in my life. I can't reconcile something in life with the acceptance of there being no god, but as I go back and forth about the possibilities, ego bias, why and why not, the spirit, continuity, my reasoning diverges and I simply give up the pursuit. I feel like there is something in this equation that I'm missing, and I can't quite put my finger on it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Religion is man made, spirituality is God given.
    Although, a spiritual consensus does not require the acknowledgement of (a) God,...God is there for those who seek. Sprituality can/may be/is the essence of self, recognizing your purpose in the reality you experience in space and time. A spiritual bankruptcy may be exhibited in the lack of compassion for others, the ego, and other frailties. I hold a spiritual exsistence by stepping out of my host to observe the whole of the Universe and where I fit in that context.
    Additionally, a spiritual being is very easy to obtain, with constant enlightenment given to one's self through meditation, and by making it a habit to practice random acts of kindness for fellow man as a way of life. For me, spirituality has nothing to do with religion and everything to do with God, as I believe God to exist as the omnipresent supernatural supreme being...as in the All, the lifeforce of the Universe...'He' does not reside in a book, a building, or a place...but stands in front of us as the Intelligent Universe...and that is why we call God, God. Sadly, a tremendous spiritual bankruptcy is demonstrated by leadership and the current human condition on/of planet Earth. Love remains unrecognized as our most valuable spiritual asset and the humans suffer greatly for it. I get a little frustrated about it all from time to time,...does it show ??NAMESTE....popeye

    ReplyDelete
  3. MAN AS PART OF THE COSMOS, DEPENDS FOR LIFE AND CONSCIOUSNESS, UPON THE FIRE OF THE UNIVERSE.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Amen!!! to that Hubertg... religion being man made, and the spiritual bankruptcy of the typical hierarchical structuring, pecking order sort of thing, and the seemingly deliberate disregard, and even censoring of any part "Love" might or could have to play.

    Yea! Hooray!! Peter, for this incredibly thorough and sane response to Irv's question!!! Fantastic initial perspective! It's all so much more simple than what people tend to make spirituality into. It's so much about: "I feel the hush of something greater than me when I hike, cook, look at my wife and children, see the "a-ha!" face of one of my students." rather than something taken up to leverage people in any way, as religions so often do. Spirituality is so much more personally sacred than that. It's much larger (as Hubertg points to), and much more personal, than all our poor shortsighted judgments, prejudice, and threatened need to control want to allow for. As Jerry would say, "You really got it going on good, man." Namaste

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ popeye

    “A spiritual bankruptcy may be exhibited in the lack of compassion for others, the ego, and other frailties.”

    I do not consider myself a spiritual person, but I definitely do not possess any ego, frailties or cruelty. Throughout my life, I have always tried to be kind not only to man but also to all living creatures.

    In my opinion, spirituality is really a personal matter. If one enjoys practicing it, he/she has my full support; however, I don’t think it is fair to disregard those who don’t.

    p.s. this is the first time you and I disagree.


    Peter,

    I enjoyed reading your narrative. I understand exactly what you are saying. I always respect people for what they believe/disbelieve as long as they are true to themselves.

    In my opinion, it really doesn’t matter what path we choose in our lives as long as we make our world a better place for everyone.

    Audrey

    ReplyDelete
  6. Audrey..that is why I said "MAY be exhibited"...
    ..instead of "IS exhibited"...because I also understand your position as well, and try to choose my words carefully on this subject. I would be burning my own bridge if I didn't. We are actually not 'off page'..it is all cool. Rock On !!
    popeye

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wow Audrey... do you really believe you have no "ego", do not "possess frailties", and have not, in some way been "cruel" in your life, inadvertently or not? Sounds a bit inhuman.

    ReplyDelete
  8. @ popeye

    Thank you for making me smile. I had a feeling you would say that.


    @ Ann,

    I was responding to Popeye’s comment because I thought he was making a connection between spirituality, ego, frailties and cruelty. I do not see any connection between them.

    Your question touches a different topic. I don’t think we are talking about that here.

    Audrey

    ReplyDelete
  9. Audrey - Sorry if I missed the point of what you were trying to say, but I was asking about what you wrote here: "I do not consider myself a spiritual person, but I definitely do not possess any ego, frailties or cruelty. Throughout my life, I have always tried to be kind not only to man but also to all living creatures."

    Sounds to me like you said you possess no ego, frailties, or cruelty. And it just seems to me that we do all get caught-up in the shortcomings which are part of being human, no matter how enlightened we are, or how sincere our good intensions. But of course Jerry has already cleared things up beautifully, being the enlightened person that he is.

    Best wishes.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It will always be as difficult to not understand God, as it is to understand ourselves. The more I attempted to understand God, the less I understood. Eventually, I found it wasn’t what I had to gain in understanding, but the conceptions I had to let go of. Of the question whether God exists or not- I had to relinquish. In the end, I saw the possibility of finding an answer in both. And ‘possibility’ proved to be the answer I was looking for. The greatness of the Mystery, is in learning to find answers from it; not in finding the answer to it.

    Just an opinion.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Jeff,

    Are you saying that we should not attempt to understand God? If yes, please forgive me, but I disagree with you. If no, please disregard my comment and clarify it for me.

    If God/dess exists, I believe it is our responsibility to attempt to understand him/her. Unless we understand God/dess, how can we really love him/her? In order to love someone, we have to understand who they are; otherwise, our love is blind. I don’t like to be blind.

    Yes, learning to find answers from the Mystery is important, but solving the Mystery is important as well. A journey without a destination is meaningless.


    Audrey

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jeff - Loved your input... the search and the answer so beautifully and unassumingly put. "...the conceptions I had to let go of"... yes indeed. "The greatness of the Mystery, is in learning to find answers from it; not in finding the answer to it."... blows me away. Thanks so much for your offering this.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I find it odd that no one here declare their spiritual "path" clearly. I was raised Irish catholic by my mother, and with American Indian beliefs by my father. The difference I found was that the physical world seemed to mirror the Indian beliefs. When stories were told about coyote, deer, birds, the antelope, and then I saw those creatures in their surroundings the explanation and the perception seemed to match. I did not find this so with Christianity. Jesus said, There are only two commandments. Love God and Love others as you love yourself. Yet, in my experience, those who have acted most cruelly have those who espoused a fundamentalist attachment to Jesus Christ.

    In Mass one day, while saying the Apostle's Creed, I found myself thinking, "I don't believe this, why am I saying it." The only time I have returned to Mass since is when asked specifically by a friend to accompany them, or for weddings, funerals, or batisms.

    I found Mass incredibly comforting most of my life. It was remniscent of my huge family crammed into a pew, my sleepy head resting on one of my sibling's shoulders (and also of my brother pinching me to try and make me be noisy so I would get in trouble). The world has been a less cozy place since I walked away.

    But I have to say, I feel a sense of freedom that is inexplicable. It is not a freedom to do anything I please, in fact I am more careful in my life as I no longer beleive that a deity will forgive me, and I know that the punishment I impose on myself is as negative as any that could be imposed on me by an external authority. (except jail, but that's another post)

    The one thing I think I do know, although I guess I could be wrong, is that the answers we seek truly are inside ourselves. But it took getting cancer and suffering through a terrible "midnight of the soul" for me to finally get it.

    ReplyDelete
  14. A quote from Peggy's interesting spiritual journey.."But I have to say, I feel a sense of freedom that is inexplicable. It is not a freedom to do anything I please, in fact I am more careful in my life as I no longer believe that a deity will forgive me,"

    I found that particularly interesting and it is a view I find makes a lot of sense even though I have not gone through a similar metamorphosis.

    Peggy's story also reminds me of a story I heard at the National Story Telling Festival in Jonesborough TN a few years back. Let's see if I can remember it...

    My whole family would go to church every Sunday. Dad made us all get in the car and there we would be sitting in the pew together. We tried to behave but it is hard for younger children. My brother and I would play games as the sermon dragged on. We would play the game of "holding your breath" to see who could hold it the longest. Back and forth we would go, trying to look at Dad's wristwatch while holding our breath. Then we all had to stand up to sing a hymn. My brother had just been holding his breath for a long time. When he stood up he must have gotten real dizzy as he started staggerin' and swoonin' and he collapsed to the floor. People nearby gasped and then someone said in a loud voice - He Must have seen Jesus! The pastor overheard this through all the commotion. Annoyed at the interruption he thundered - "NOBODY SEES JESUS IN MY CHURCH!"

    ReplyDelete
  15. I don't think that I have 'chosen' to follow a spiritual path per se, but when I get out of my own way I experience moments of grace that I identify as 'spiritual': ego melts and makes way for immediate connections whether it be with spiders or waves or panhandlers or lemons; I am present with what is and I bow to the mystery of it all. These moments are purchased with attention, never with money or power. Rilke said,"Live the questions, not the answers." Blake said...'to see the world in a grain of sand." When I can access this part of myself I feel peace even during turmoil. I believe that cultivating these moments could achieve waves of compassion that might make the earth a better place to live.
    And, yes, I am severely allergic to organized religion.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Audrey,

    If I were to tell you or anyone else whether it is right or wrong in trying to understand (or not understand) God, I would be going against what little I believe to have gained. I was only voicing a personal opinion and experience, not of any truth beyond my own, without any consideration of whether it should be excepted or rejected in whole or part. I can only say, take from it what you will, and don’t allow any of it to constrain you.

    As for my point: Personally, I found more meaning in accepting the Mystery than in continually trying to solve it- to find someone who has solved it, or to find anyone who knew someone who might possibly have solved it. I could not make the choice of whether God existed or not purely on my own personal preference or arbitrary decision. Then one day I asked myself a very simple question(which I happen to be very good at.) If God should manifest into a visible being, and plant one foot into the Atlantic Ocean and the other the Pacific; would I then believe? I was completely surprised by my conclusion. Then I remembered reading somewhere what Zen calls; “the great doubt.” I realized my experience may not be the equal of the meaning, but I figured it was about as close as I would ever get. Yet, I also asked myself why this saying mean’t something now, but not before? It all seems to be different plateaus, where the last could possibly be the first(please don‘t ask me to explain that.) So all inquiries I attempted would eventually lead to contradictions- the contradictions became the Mystery, and the Mystery became the meaning. Oh, and I also read somewhere… everyone loves a mystery.

    Jeff

    Thanks to you and Anne for your comments. And to everyone else sharing their stories. And ArtuDeetu, I’m on vacation, and dozing in and out with a good old-fashion cold. I really needed a great story like that. Very, very funny!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Jeff,

    Thank you for answering my question. I was not trying to challenge you, but because I had read your previous posts, I was very interested in engaging with you.

    I definitely understand your position. I think we all have to follow our hearts. Who knows maybe we all end up in the same place.


    p.s. I hope you feel better.


    Audrey

    ReplyDelete
  18. "Glory be to God for dappled things"
    --Gerard Manley Hopkins

    ReplyDelete
  19. Peter, this was beautifully written and you exquisitely articulate a series of 'phases' as parents would call them, that I think will echo with everyone, whether they choose to acknowledge it or not. I definitely have made my way to the devout atheist stage of my life. I was introduced to religion and Christianity at a very early age by my parents, and have questions its legitimacy from day one. As a child being dragged to church on Sunday, I would sit in the congregation wondering how soon it would be until I could get back to Castlevania on my highly coveted NES. As I got older, I began to actually listen to what was going on around me and I would wonder how anyone could believe so literally in what came across as blatant impossibilities proposed in the Holy Bible, a book that lacks any page turning qualities in my opinion. Finally, I was introduced to a new kind of faith in science, which offered me plausible answers that were buttressed with real evidence and hard data. In the most recent few years of my life, I have come to soften to the idea of spirituality in some sense, but I have vowed never to step into organized religion. While I have observed its capability of shaping a community and forging friendships, I have also witnessed its ability to turn family on each other and create hatred that would otherwise not exist. Additionally, I have encountered far too many people willing to disregard and disrespect the work I do, and the genius of the scientists upon whose shoulders I stand all for their blind faith in a religion they don't really understand. So for me, it is the hard line all the way, I will stay out of God's way as long as God stays out of mine;)

    ReplyDelete
  20. Sir Arrogant thanks all of you who made the astute comments above. I am still formulating my part II, for what it's worth.

    ReplyDelete
  21. To guybers,
    Hopefully, when a majority of creationist are less certain of the nature of God, as the scientific community admits of their limited knowledge of Nature; it may lead to a more complete understanding of their field of concern as it has in yours. So keep the faith..or facts, as the case may be.

    ReplyDelete
  22. @guybers,

    I find your comments very thoughful. I think many of us are aware that your perspective changes over time (as you get older) Of course, I'm a little concerned with using the word "faith" with respect to science. But I can understand where you are coming from, so to speak.

    You wrote..."I have come to soften to the idea of spirituality in some sense, but I have vowed never to step into organized religion."

    I think this is my sort of perspective also, but I never was actively part of organized religion to begin with. That was really the whole point of the question that Peter ended up posting here.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Good stuff!

    Yeah I know I'm late, but last week I had a religious experience, stomach virus. Spent three days on the sofa with fever and other fun. I think I met my spirit guide, . . . it either Oprah or Elmo.

    Anyway here a quote and a link to an inteview that might be of interest to some:

    "I think a number of us have been taught to look up into the sky for the divine instead of down at the ground under our feet. I also think a lot of us have been taught to devalue our daily experience as being secular, mundane, unholy, and yet the teaching I have received in my life points me to the earth and even encourages me not to draw such hard lines between heaven/earth, sacred/secular, everyday/mystical."

    Barbara Brown Taylor, author of the new book "An Altar in the World," from a United Methodist Reporter interview with Dallas writer Mary Jacobs.

    http://www.umportal.org/article.asp?id=4767

    ReplyDelete