Skip to main content

Why I Wear the Pin


The safety pin has come to stand for opposition to the election of Donald Trump to the office of president. I have come across more than one compelling, well-written piece arguing why I should not--or that I should do so only if I meet a certain set of conditions.

Some say that how dare I, a white male, assume to be the safe haven for the oppressed--particularly now when Trump was elevated through an unprecedented surge in white male voters. These writers would posit that guilty white liberals just want some way to feel better, want a way to wave at the other and say, "it wasn't me; I'm with her!" Others would argue, fine, wear it, but know that it is a very specific symbol meant to inform marginalized people that you are there to be a shield in the event of public harassment, harassment that has sharply spiked in the days since the election. These folks would say that I need training in de-escalation techniques, that I should be ready for violence, and that I may bring public abuse on myself simply for wearing the pin.

I'm going to wear it anyway, and here's why:

This is my America, too. The diminution of any one person's--or group's--rights is an attack on my rights. The Constitution applies equally to all or it applies to none. The right I hold most sacred is the right to free speech. This pin is my speech act, my act of proclaiming loudly and clearly for all to see that I do not stand for oppression, hate, discrimination, obfuscation, or bullying.

Yes, I do want to feel better, and I do feel guilty. If all I did was wear a pin and nothing else changed in my life, I would be a hypocrite. I wear the pin to remind myself of a commitment I am making towards the seemingly incompatible goals of loving kindness and righteous defiance. The great agents of change I admire always used the path of non-violent resistance. This pin shall be for me a symbol of just that. This election has been a jolting wake-up call for me, for my values, and for my nation.

Non-violent resistance involves quite specialized training to be successful, and we should all get this training so that when we protest, when we write on the internet, when we talk to relatives and friends, and God forbid, if we find ourselves in the middle of a public act of aggressive hate, either as witness or victim, we will know what to do. We will know how to calmly say and do what, looking back, we wished we had done. We will use self-control, discipline, and the courage that comes from solidly held beliefs that have been hard-earned through open and honest debate, intense introspection, and a humility to the great scholars, sages, and artists past and present.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fake News Only Works on the Ignorant

On May 16, a sea of red-clad teachers descended upon our legislative building to give voice to the frustration many across the state share about the drastic cuts to public education since the Republican super-majority all but hijacked democracy. These cuts are so deep and at times punitive that they seem part of an ideological assault on the very idea of public education rather than some sort of economic prudence claimed by GOP leadership. In the person of Betsy DeVos we see this ideology nakedly espoused on the national stage. Gutting public schools in favor of for-profit charters, Christian private schools, and homeschooling has been her life's work, aided and abetted by her family's billions. She and the NCGA GOP are following a playbook much in the manner of how the Koch brothers systematically attack attempts to address climate change. Meanwhile, the Cambridge Analytica scandal has revealed how compromised our personal data is, and to what lengths political operatives...
Post a Comment
Read more

Trump Unpacked, Episode 1, in Which the Donald Remarks Upon the Pre-dawn Raid of Paul Manafort

I know Mr. Manafort, ( You know, the same way you might "know" your neighbor. Not too close, but I "know" him. Classic downplaying of their relationship.) haven’t spoken to him in a long time, (Probably technically true, but you can bet that Trump's legal team has been all over Manafort's. In fact, many observers think that Manofort's dumping his old legal team for a new one immediately after the raid is a sign that Trump threw him under the bus.) but I know him. ( Just like I know my secret service guy, what's his name. ) He was with the campaign, (he was the campaign manager, about as close as you can get to the center of power.) as you know, (yes, we know) for a very short period of time, (five grueling months, in fact) a relatively short period of time, (he was manager during the Cleveland convention, pretty significant!) but I’ve always known him to be a good man. (This is a non sequitur. "Good man" is nearly an insult in th...
Post a Comment
Read more

#BoycottBannon

"Bannon declares war on GOP," the headlines blared after the Bloated One's performance before Charlie Rose on 60 Minutes Sunday night. I do not disparage Rose the interview; after all, until recently, Bannon was a top aide in the White House. Committing his insights to record is useful and important. Bannon's assessment that the firing of Comey was the worst mistake in modern political history is revelatory on a number of levels. However, once the fallout from this interview settles, it is time for a total boycott of everything Bannon. While it is true that Bannon received degrees from both Georgetown and Harvard, that qualifies him as a smart guy, not a genius. It is a well known phenomenon that advisers to winning candidates are often hailed as political seers, when in fact it takes a strong candidate, many talented advisers, and sheer luck to win an election. We love the idea that there must be some sort of semi-mad genius in the wings, pulling invisible lever...
Post a Comment
Read more