Skip to main content

Why I Wear the Pin


The safety pin has come to stand for opposition to the election of Donald Trump to the office of president. I have come across more than one compelling, well-written piece arguing why I should not--or that I should do so only if I meet a certain set of conditions.

Some say that how dare I, a white male, assume to be the safe haven for the oppressed--particularly now when Trump was elevated through an unprecedented surge in white male voters. These writers would posit that guilty white liberals just want some way to feel better, want a way to wave at the other and say, "it wasn't me; I'm with her!" Others would argue, fine, wear it, but know that it is a very specific symbol meant to inform marginalized people that you are there to be a shield in the event of public harassment, harassment that has sharply spiked in the days since the election. These folks would say that I need training in de-escalation techniques, that I should be ready for violence, and that I may bring public abuse on myself simply for wearing the pin.

I'm going to wear it anyway, and here's why:

This is my America, too. The diminution of any one person's--or group's--rights is an attack on my rights. The Constitution applies equally to all or it applies to none. The right I hold most sacred is the right to free speech. This pin is my speech act, my act of proclaiming loudly and clearly for all to see that I do not stand for oppression, hate, discrimination, obfuscation, or bullying.

Yes, I do want to feel better, and I do feel guilty. If all I did was wear a pin and nothing else changed in my life, I would be a hypocrite. I wear the pin to remind myself of a commitment I am making towards the seemingly incompatible goals of loving kindness and righteous defiance. The great agents of change I admire always used the path of non-violent resistance. This pin shall be for me a symbol of just that. This election has been a jolting wake-up call for me, for my values, and for my nation.

Non-violent resistance involves quite specialized training to be successful, and we should all get this training so that when we protest, when we write on the internet, when we talk to relatives and friends, and God forbid, if we find ourselves in the middle of a public act of aggressive hate, either as witness or victim, we will know what to do. We will know how to calmly say and do what, looking back, we wished we had done. We will use self-control, discipline, and the courage that comes from solidly held beliefs that have been hard-earned through open and honest debate, intense introspection, and a humility to the great scholars, sages, and artists past and present.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Winston-Salem, NC, Crushed by Trump, Sessions, and the State Legislature. By Peter Wilbur

On Monday night in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, a resolution pronouncing my community a " welcoming city " was withdrawn from consideration by its author, Councilman Dan Besse . This document, which is a watered-down compromise of a previously proposed "sanctuary city" resolution promoted by a group of persistent activists, is for now the latest casualty of a far-right, all-out assault on immigrants led by the Trump administration and state legislatures across the country, including the gerrymandered state house in Raleigh. Before drilling into the details of what happened on Main Street last night in a medium-sized city in the middle of North Carolina, let us take an overview of where immigrant rights stand now. We know that Trump has twice signed executive orders banning travelers from "certain" Muslim majority nations, countries chosen apparently for their ability to rouse fear in the hearts of heartland America than out of any sober analysis of...

Fake News Only Works on the Ignorant

On May 16, a sea of red-clad teachers descended upon our legislative building to give voice to the frustration many across the state share about the drastic cuts to public education since the Republican super-majority all but hijacked democracy. These cuts are so deep and at times punitive that they seem part of an ideological assault on the very idea of public education rather than some sort of economic prudence claimed by GOP leadership. In the person of Betsy DeVos we see this ideology nakedly espoused on the national stage. Gutting public schools in favor of for-profit charters, Christian private schools, and homeschooling has been her life's work, aided and abetted by her family's billions. She and the NCGA GOP are following a playbook much in the manner of how the Koch brothers systematically attack attempts to address climate change. Meanwhile, the Cambridge Analytica scandal has revealed how compromised our personal data is, and to what lengths political operatives...

The Necessity of Never Letting Stephen Miller Near a Negotiating Table

Today the New York Times published an op-ed by Ross Douthat, one of several conservative commentators who have poked the eye from time to time of the paper of record's mostly liberal readership. Setting aside the question of whether the Times is a Nazi publication, accusations of which abound on Twitter, I want to focus for now on Douthat's arguments. My subscription is safe, mainly because I believe in the wall separating news from opinion, and because, like it or not, the Times will continue to be an important national voice. Douthat's piece is premised on a faulty notion: that there are immigration restrictionists who are not bigots. There may be some handful of people for which this may be true, but one only need take a cursory listen to the braying voices leading this charge, people like Tucker Carlson and Ann Coulter. We should never forget the outright lies that launched Trump's campaign. Mexico sends its worst. Mexicans are rapists. The tropes trotted out a...