Skip to main content

ON VOTER SUPPRESSION:


After the election in 2012, North Carolina enacted what many observers have called the most restrictive voting laws in the country, laws that were deliberately constructed to disenfranchise people of color. The intellectual cover for these laws is that they are an effort to counter voter fraud. The impact of actual fraud has been negligible, as many independent watchdog groups and government agencies have reported. There will always be a tiny amount of inconsistency, and yes, a few people may fraudulently vote. But these numbers represent the tiniest, statistically insignificant percentage of all votes cast.
Now, North Carolina governor Pat McCrory and his legal team are filing challenges based on supposed fraud in over half of the state's counties. With Roy Cooper up by thousands of votes, why are they wasting our time with what, even if they win every single challenge, is an effort that cannot change the overall results? Because sowing doubt in the credibility of elections in general gives state GOP leaders continued cover to support the suppression of voters, which, sadly, our state seems bent on continuing. I hope that legal challenges against these onerous laws prevail. It is important to let our voices be heard about this, because above all McCrory and his Republican allies in the state want to sow confusion and discord. The impending recount that is likely because the vote still lies under the 10,000 threshold, while certainly legal, means that the Cooper transition, and whatever work it will be able to accomplish, will be hamstrung for months. This is pure and deliberate obstructionism.
North Carolina's embrace of anti-democratic voting laws is part of a national trend. Chipping away at the hard-earned rights of minority voters is seen by many Republicans as the only way to stem the tide of changing demographics that is certainly not good for them. Donald Trump infamously made fraud a centerpiece of his campaign, particularly when he was losing in the polls. He claimed that it was part of a conspiracy of certain media outlets and Hillary Clinton who were colluding to enable "inner-city" residents (we can all read that code) to vote multiple times, to name one ludicrous example. 
That brings us to the appointment of Jeff Sessions to lead the Justice Department. This is a man who has fought against civil rights his entire career, who has publicly stated that the 1965 Voting Rights Act is "an intrusive law." We can never forget the defining moment in the history of voting rights: the brutal attack on John Lewis and several hundred other protestors on the Edmund Pettus bridge in Mr. Sessions' home state of Alabama. Outrage at this attack precipitated the eventual passage of the historic and sweeping protection of all citizens' right to vote. Mr. Sessions' discrediting of this historic legislation puts him firmly on the side of those who stood in the way of and beat protestors on that day in March, 1965.
The right to vote is, along with free speech, at the very core of our freedoms. It is the vehicle through which we, the people, select the representatives who will carry out our wishes in government. How a major political party can defend the suppression of these rights is beyond baffling: it is sickening, particularly given the fact that the struggle to gain these rights is within the living memory of so many heroic cvil rights pioneers. Voter suppression, including literacy tests, poll taxes, and outright intimidation, were the centerpiece of the Jim Crow South. Disenfranchised people were defenseless against all manner of degrading, humiliating, racist, and utterly constraining laws that segregated everything from work to water fountains to marriage. Allowing Mr. Sessions to head the agency that is supposed to ensure equal justice for all Americans is truly frightening, and his and Mr. Trump's attack on voting rights take us right back to the 1960s. Given that we have a national holiday for Martin Luther King, Jr., hasn't history settled this score already? To bring it back home, Pat McCrory's desperate and misguided attempt to hide behind the red herring of voter fraud ties him to the ignominious history of racial segregation and bigotry with which our country so desperately needs to come to terms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fake News Only Works on the Ignorant

On May 16, a sea of red-clad teachers descended upon our legislative building to give voice to the frustration many across the state share about the drastic cuts to public education since the Republican super-majority all but hijacked democracy. These cuts are so deep and at times punitive that they seem part of an ideological assault on the very idea of public education rather than some sort of economic prudence claimed by GOP leadership. In the person of Betsy DeVos we see this ideology nakedly espoused on the national stage. Gutting public schools in favor of for-profit charters, Christian private schools, and homeschooling has been her life's work, aided and abetted by her family's billions. She and the NCGA GOP are following a playbook much in the manner of how the Koch brothers systematically attack attempts to address climate change. Meanwhile, the Cambridge Analytica scandal has revealed how compromised our personal data is, and to what lengths political operatives

Winston-Salem, NC, Crushed by Trump, Sessions, and the State Legislature. By Peter Wilbur

On Monday night in Winston-Salem, North Carolina, a resolution pronouncing my community a " welcoming city " was withdrawn from consideration by its author, Councilman Dan Besse . This document, which is a watered-down compromise of a previously proposed "sanctuary city" resolution promoted by a group of persistent activists, is for now the latest casualty of a far-right, all-out assault on immigrants led by the Trump administration and state legislatures across the country, including the gerrymandered state house in Raleigh. Before drilling into the details of what happened on Main Street last night in a medium-sized city in the middle of North Carolina, let us take an overview of where immigrant rights stand now. We know that Trump has twice signed executive orders banning travelers from "certain" Muslim majority nations, countries chosen apparently for their ability to rouse fear in the hearts of heartland America than out of any sober analysis of

Anti-fascist Protesters in the Age of the Resistance

By Peter Wilbur Edited by Natalie Herr In the wake of the Charlottesville violence and subsequent actions and debate surrounding Confederate monuments, millions of Americans are learning of experienced activist groups whom most have rarely heard of or encountered before. At the same time, these groups are now interacting with a cadre of brand-new activists drawn to the internet--and the streets--in response to Trump's ascendence. Inevitably, mischaracterization and misunderstanding have ensued, so I think it worthwhile at this critical juncture to unpack some mythology about anti-fascists and to offer a few suggestions as we move forward through this dark era in our nation's history. Let's be clear: the president is not the only person drawing false equivalencies between neo-Nazis and far-left activists. Even the New York Times engaged in a bit of it in a recent piece about leftists that relied heavily on anecdote, and opened with a discussion of violence,