Skip to main content

THE DONALD AND HIS TWEET NOTHINGS




The Sunday morning routine: newspaper, coffee, and dog walk, now includes watching the preceding night's Alec Baldwin Trump interpretation on SNL, and reading Trump's tweet about said performance. These reactions--this one written during the actual broadcast!--would be laughably thin-skinned if they weren't coming from the soon-to-be leader of the free world. What is the takeaway here? How should we, and the press, react to Trump's often incendiary, petulant, or bragging tweets?

It is important to see this kind of messaging in the context of Steve Bannon's Breitbart, the rise of fake/misleading/character assassinating news, the proliferation of blogs, social media tools, and cable channels, and the diminution of the power of a unified, traditional press. Why submit to conventional press briefings, with their messy Q and A sessions, when you can go straight to your core followers with a few thumb taps? A tweet is instant, and deliciously one-sided. Trump of course knows that each time he writes something controversial, he is able to dominate the news cycle on a topic of his choosing. Presidents' attempting to circumvent the pesky media is nothing new. FDR's fireside chats are an early example, and Kennedy's surprise victory in 1960 is attributed to his use of television to speak directly to the people. Trump's tweets, however, seem completely unvarnished, and often unhinged.

But how do we react to these tweets? Is Trump just cleverly distracting us from his odious cabinet appointments, his confusing and troubling policy positions, and his impossibly intractable business conflicts? Whether that is his intent, we may never know, and pundits are spending many hours debating the point. It is certain that the tweets are covered extensively by the media, necessarily pushing out other important stories. I think the solution lies in how we handle his outright lies. A great example of this is when Trump tweeted that "millions" of people fraudulently voted for him. Some outlets just regurgitated the tweet and reaction to it, while others took pains, even in their headlines to make it clear that Trump's claim had utterly no basis in fact. And that is the key. The story then becomes another in a long line of exposing Trump for the liar that he is. Trump's Twitter feed is an indelible record of what he says and, I increasingly believe, what he thinks. I am in the camp who believes that what we get at 3 a.m. is the unvarnished Trumpian id: a scary, scary place to peer inside, but ever necessary if we are to remain vigilant against the coming madness. Let's just hope he keeps his account active as President.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fake News Only Works on the Ignorant

On May 16, a sea of red-clad teachers descended upon our legislative building to give voice to the frustration many across the state share about the drastic cuts to public education since the Republican super-majority all but hijacked democracy. These cuts are so deep and at times punitive that they seem part of an ideological assault on the very idea of public education rather than some sort of economic prudence claimed by GOP leadership. In the person of Betsy DeVos we see this ideology nakedly espoused on the national stage. Gutting public schools in favor of for-profit charters, Christian private schools, and homeschooling has been her life's work, aided and abetted by her family's billions. She and the NCGA GOP are following a playbook much in the manner of how the Koch brothers systematically attack attempts to address climate change. Meanwhile, the Cambridge Analytica scandal has revealed how compromised our personal data is, and to what lengths political operatives...

Trump Unpacked, Episode 1, in Which the Donald Remarks Upon the Pre-dawn Raid of Paul Manafort

I know Mr. Manafort, ( You know, the same way you might "know" your neighbor. Not too close, but I "know" him. Classic downplaying of their relationship.) haven’t spoken to him in a long time, (Probably technically true, but you can bet that Trump's legal team has been all over Manafort's. In fact, many observers think that Manofort's dumping his old legal team for a new one immediately after the raid is a sign that Trump threw him under the bus.) but I know him. ( Just like I know my secret service guy, what's his name. ) He was with the campaign, (he was the campaign manager, about as close as you can get to the center of power.) as you know, (yes, we know) for a very short period of time, (five grueling months, in fact) a relatively short period of time, (he was manager during the Cleveland convention, pretty significant!) but I’ve always known him to be a good man. (This is a non sequitur. "Good man" is nearly an insult in th...

#BoycottBannon

"Bannon declares war on GOP," the headlines blared after the Bloated One's performance before Charlie Rose on 60 Minutes Sunday night. I do not disparage Rose the interview; after all, until recently, Bannon was a top aide in the White House. Committing his insights to record is useful and important. Bannon's assessment that the firing of Comey was the worst mistake in modern political history is revelatory on a number of levels. However, once the fallout from this interview settles, it is time for a total boycott of everything Bannon. While it is true that Bannon received degrees from both Georgetown and Harvard, that qualifies him as a smart guy, not a genius. It is a well known phenomenon that advisers to winning candidates are often hailed as political seers, when in fact it takes a strong candidate, many talented advisers, and sheer luck to win an election. We love the idea that there must be some sort of semi-mad genius in the wings, pulling invisible lever...